THREE HISTORICAL MOMENTS IN WHICH THE HUMAN BEING WAS CLOSE TO EXTINCTION


 

Given the gradual demographic growth of human beings on Earth, we might think that the time will come when we will not all fit on the Blue Planet –or we have depleted all its natural resources–, that we will have to go out to find new spaces where we can all fit.

But there have been at least three moments in history when humans have come very close to extinction.


A reconstruction based on the DNA of a Neanderthal woman

Photograph by Joe McNally

 1. 1.2 million years ago: humanity before being exclusively Homo sapiens

In 2009, some scientists analyzed two human genome sequences in search of the most recent common ancestor (ACMR). Mobile genetic elements are small sequences of DNA that do not stay in one place; they move and multiply within the genome, making it easier to replicate these elements than to eliminate them, since once they are inside a gene they will tend to remain. In this way, the elements become a kind of trace or record to determine how long ago they were installed for the first time.

According to this study:

The genealogy of a genetic region that contains one or more of these mobile elements is on average older than the rest. Since genealogies with polymorphic or mobile elements are ancient, they must have been formed by force majeure events in ancient history, and are insensitive to recent demographic events, such as expansions and declines in population.

Thus they were able to read the history of mankind through genes and, apparently, 1.2 million years ago things were not going well since Homo sapiens , Homo ergaster and Homo erectus added around the planet a population of just between 18,000 and 26,000 individuals.

This means that, across the planet, any humanoid species that was able to contribute genes to a modern-day human was, in total, smaller than the current gorilla population (considering that gorillas only inhabit one continent and humans both Africa as Eurasia).


Homo erectus, the first human species are known to control fire | Image: National Museum of Mongolian History in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

 The result was surprising because other evidence indicated that humans were not in danger of extinction at that time, which is known from stone tools found in Turkey 1.2 million years ago. In 2008 a group of archaeologists found the jaw of a human around 30 years of age in Atapuerca, Spain, which indicates that we were scattered, but why so close to extinction?

According to Chad Huff, co-author of the study, more than an anomaly it was the normal state of humanity, "either that the population increased exaggeratedly and later collapsed or that modern humans always formed a small population over millions of years".

Humans then may have been what today would be considered an endangered species for most of their history. The world's small population of humans suggests that the idea of ​​the species' expansion beyond the African continent, while it may be a correct observation, is genetically insignificant.

Those nomadic tool makers may have perished and only the nuclear population that remained close to home could have contributed to the genetic background.

2. 150 thousand years ago: Homo sapiens and the great cooling

About 195 thousand years ago the world changed, the temperature decreased during winter and also in summer. Glaciers expanded at the same time that entire habitats were destroyed. This era is officially called "marine isotope stage 6" (to become known through the analysis of oxygen isotopes settled in the deep ocean) and is also known as the glacial period or the last Ice Age.

In Africa, human populations were divided; perhaps this happened intentionally when certain groups were displaced due to the decrease inhabitable land, but it could also have happened by chance as habitable space was shrinking. Either way, the human population suffered heavy casualties. Some believe that the reproductive population was reduced to only 600 people.


Comparison of Homo sapiens and Neanderthal faces

 The survivors became both agile and fortunate, as they were lucky enough to settle by the sea, in what is now South Africa; that place was particularly rich in plants that stored their energy in the roots, under the ground; in addition, the water was slightly warm, which provided a source of food (seafood).

Thanks to this, humans were able to gather enough food to survive, in addition to developing ways to help each other. A cave known as the code PP13B near Pinnacle Point in South Africa shows that the people of that area used the shells as tools. It is also possible that they tempered their stone tools with heat, which shows that the behavior of these settlers was more modern than was admitted.

3. 70 thousand years ago: the Toba catastrophe

About 70,000 years ago, Sumatra blew up, or rather, a supervolcano located on Lake Toba erupted. According to the Geological Society, a "supereruption" differs from a common volcanic eruption and other environmental catastrophes such as earthquakes because "its environmental effects threaten civilization." Locally, the eruption created a crater that later became Lake Toba; globally, it spewed so much ash and debris into the air that, by some estimates, it may have dimmed the sunlight for 6 years.


Scientists analyzed the remains of two Paleolithic human camps in South Africa (PP5-6 and VBB) to see if there were dramatic changes after the Toba eruption 74,000 years ago in Sumatra. They found clear evidence that ash and glass from the eruption fell at these sites, yet the human presence continued uninterrupted.

When this happened, humans were already in an adverse situation as they suffered from the dry and cold climate, and now, overwinter years, a noxious gas was spreading in the atmosphere. Some experts estimate that the population was reduced to between one and 10 thousand people.

If the Toba had as much impact as some belief, from one year to the next people saw themselves in a different world. A pollen analysis before and after the explosion, from a sample collected in the Bay of Bengal, showed that the arboreal and wooded flora was replaced by a growth of grasslands, which represents a drastic change for the ecosystem.

According to the first theories, humans, rather than surviving, divided, and managed to subsist. Steven Ambrose, who promotes the theory of the Toba catastrophe, says:

One consequence of the volcanic winter may have been the rapid differentiation of small migrant populations originating from the African continent towards what is known as modern human races. The bottleneck raises a solution to the question: Why do human populations look so different from each other despite being of African origin? As the African human diaspora passed through the prism of the volcanic Toba winter, a rainbow of differences appeared.

Or maybe not. The Toba theory continues to be debated. While some believe that a series of bottlenecks transformed humans into today's diverse populations, others believe that it only meant a brief period of unpleasant years that did not tangibly change humanity.

The Bay of Bengal may have been devastated by the blast, but analyzes of samples from Lake Malawi indicate that the effect on the climate and ecosystem was minimal. People may have changed and migrated due to a number of climatic, behavioral, or environmental circumstances, without necessarily being due to the eruption of the volcano.




Scroll to top